Home > Family Law > Community Property

COMMUNITY PROPERTY

Community property is a marital property regime that originated in civil lawjurisdictions, and is now also found in some common law jurisdictions.

In a community property jurisdiction, most property acquired during the marriage (except for gifts or inheritances) is owned jointly by both spouses and is divided upon divorce, annulment or death. Joint ownership is automatically presumed by law in the absence of specific evidence that would point to a contrary conclusion for a particular piece of property. The community property system is usually justified by the idea that such joint ownership recognizes the theoretically equal contributions of both spouses to the creation and operation of the family unit.

Division of community property may take place by item, by splitting all items or by value. In some jurisdictions, such as California, a 50/50 division of community property is mandated by law. In non-community property states property may be divided by equitable distribution. Generally speaking, the property that each partner brings into the marriage or receives by gift, bequest or devise during marriage is called separate property.

In the United States there are nine community property states: Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin. In addition, Puerto Rico is a community property jurisdiction.

In Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin, division of property occurs under community property rules. While specifics differ from state to state, in general the community property approach equally divides the assets of the marriage between the spouses when they divorce. Any separate property is retained by the spouse who owns it.

The first dispute in contested cases is regarding which marital assets are community property. Usually, all earnings acquired during marriage and everything obtained with those earnings are community property. All debts incurred during marriage, unless the creditor was specifically looking to the separate property of one spouse for payment, are community property debts.

Generally separate property will be:

*Gifts and inheritances given just to that spouse;
*Personal injury awards received by that spouse;
*Proceeds of a pension that vested before marriage;
*Properties purchased with the separate funds of a spouse remain that spouse's separate property; and/or
*A business owned by one spouse before the marriage remains his or her separate property during the marriage, although a portion of it may be considered community property if the business increased in value during the marriage or both spouses worked at it.

Conflict may arise when separate property is mixed together with community property. Sometimes, one spouse may be able to identify which portion of the property is separate. One example of this is when a house is owned before marriage and continuing mortgage payments are made throughout the marriage. Otherwise if the separate property becomes mixed with the community property, and the two cannot be distinguished, the entire thing becomes community property.

The only way to avoid the equal division consequences of the community property laws is through the use of a qualifying prenuptial agreement.

Property to Be Divided

Certain kinds of property continue to create controversy at divorce, even under the clear division rules of the community property system. Divorcing couples need to be aware of these assets and the issues their division may present.

Family Home. The primary residential property owned by the divorcing couple is often the marriage's largest asset. Dealing with its division can be complicated, particularly when there are children involved. Courts often favor allowing the custodial parent to retain the home. Doing so may require complicated arrangements to ensure that the spouse who leaves receives adequate compensation for the home's value as well as provisions for ongoing mortgage payments, tax liabilities and upkeep of the home. When these issues cannot be resolved, the couple may be forced to sell the home and split the proceeds.

Pensions. Pensions often follow the family home as the second largest marital asset. When there are other income sources sufficient to compensate the non-pension holder, courts may leave vested pension rights in the spouse who earned it. Otherwise, under a federal law that makes division of pensions easier, a court in a divorce case may enter a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) requiring the administrator of the pension to make payment to both the worker and their former spouse.

Family-Owned Businesses. When couples work together in a family owned business, division of the business presents complex allocation and valuation problems. First, the couple or the court must decide who gets the business. Then, there must be a determination of its worth, which can require costly evaluation by outside experts. As with family homes, if there are not enough marital assets to adequately compensate the non-retaining spouse, there may be the necessity of a forced sale or long-term buy-out.

Conclusion

Many couples have a difficult time reaching an agreement about how to divide their property. Because the specific rules in each state vary significantly and because the division of property depends on the complexity of your assets and liabilities, it is important to consult with an experienced family law attorney for assistance if you anticipate the division of property is likely to be an issue of controversy in your divorce.

The Law Office of Mark A. Reed can help make sure that the division of community property is equitable. Call for a free initial consultation.
858-277-0232.